Back to Dashboard

Steve Owens

25d overdue
Notes
Customer ID: cus_UV01BGt2IV8dfV
Facebook Ad Account
act_1077564357902924
Campaign Filter
Prefix: Steve Owens
Performance Metrics
Operations — Last 30 Days
New Leads
Live Transfers
LT Show Rate
Appt Shows
No Shows
Show Rate
Total Shows
Booked
Ad Spend
Cost Per Lead
Cost Per Show
Performance Report
Generated 2026-06-24
Last 14 Days
Leads: 28
Live Transfers + Appointments: 3
— Over the last 14 days, 28 leads were generated at $717 in spend, but only 3 converted to live transfers or appointments, putting the lead-to-appointment rate at 10.7% and cost per appointment at $239 — both outside target range.
Last 30 Days
Leads: 73
Live Transfers + Appointments: 8
— Over the last 30 days, 73 leads were generated at $1,520 in spend with 8 live transfers or appointments, resulting in an 11% lead-to-appointment rate and $190 cost per appointment — both still below the 20% and $100–$150 KPI targets.
Last 5 Appointments & Live Transfers
2026-06-09 Appointment — Rachelle Showed
2026-06-09 Appointment — Michael Salyards Showed
2026-06-17 Appointment — Sara Downs Showed
2026-06-22 Appointment — Johan Borge Showed
2026-06-25 Appointment — Kimberly Horkavy Showed
Common Concerns for the Client
  • Too many leads are not converting to real appointments or live transfers — feels like low quality traffic
  • The cost per appointment is too high relative to what he's paying and what he's closing
  • No new creatives have launched in 14 days and he may wonder if the team is actively working the account
Action Steps We Are Taking
  • Launch at least 2–3 fresh creatives this week targeting homeowners with pool-ready yards, since no new creatives have been pushed in the last 14 days and the top spender is a duplicate creative name flagged for review
  • Audit the lead-to-appointment flow — review the calendar booking process and live transfer handoff protocol to address the issues Steve flagged on the May 30 call around missed appointments and a poor live transfer experience
  • Reallocate budget toward the top CTR performers (og #4 and og #5 at $23–$714 spend) and pause or reduce spend on the lower-performing ads among the 13 active to consolidate results
  • Confirm Steve's current availability and calendar sync before the next check-in to ensure incoming appointments are landing at times he can actually take them
Objections & Reframes
  • Objection: The leads aren't converting and the cost per appointment is way too high. Reframe: You're right that we're not at target yet — our lead-to-appointment rate is 11% against a 20% goal, and we're actively fixing two things that are dragging that number down: the calendar setup and live transfer quality, both of which you flagged. That's a process fix that directly lifts conversion without needing to spend more.
  • Objection: I haven't seen anything new from the team in the last two weeks. Reframe: That's fair feedback — we haven't pushed new creative in 14 days and that's on us. We're launching fresh ads this week and you'll see those in the account by end of week.
  • Objection: One of my appointments actually went well but most of this isn't turning into real business. Reframe: The Michaels Salyard appointment is exactly the proof of concept we want to replicate — our job now is to filter for more of those quality conversations by tightening the intake process and getting the right people on your calendar consistently.
Contact History 4 entries
2026-07-01 SMS
CSM
SMS: followed up on last appointments, asked if any decided to move forward.
2026-06-26 CALL
CSM
Spoke with Steve to review his recent appointments. The appointment with Johann/Juan was canceled. I attempted to reschedule it through our system, but the prospect canceled shortly afterward. Steve confirmed that his appointment with Kim went well. However, there was another appointment scheduled for today with Jennifer that he missed because the text conversation was confusing. He initially believed the prospect had ended the conversation after hanging up, so he didn’t realize the appointment had actually been scheduled. We’ll review the interaction internally with the setters to understand what happened and see if the appointment can be recovered or rescheduled. He also confirmed that his second appointment with Michael went very well, which was encouraging. Steve mentioned that weekend appointments can be difficult for him, particularly around 11:00 a.m., so we should keep that in mind when scheduling future meetings. Overall, he was happy with the progress. I let him know I would share his feedback with the team, look into the missed Jennifer appointment, and continue working to fill his calendar with qualified appointments. As lead volume increases, we can also discuss the possibility of increasing ad spend to generate even more opportunities.
2026-06-15 CALL
CSM
Appointment went great with Michaels salyard. Appreciates the services. "super deal."
2026-05-30 CALL
CSM
Good call with Steve. he mentioned going to one client location for an evaluation. he also mentioned the live transfer didn't go that great . and also mentioned some calendar appointment issues. check his availability to make sure he can make the appointment